McPhatter v. Ryan et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 4, 2013
ORDER that Plaintiff's 14 Motion to Reconsider is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 2/4/2013.(LFIG)
|February 21, 2012
ORDER (Service Packet) - Defendants State of Arizona, Ryan, Jane Doe Ryan, and the Doe Defendants are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the First Amended Complaint (Doc. 6), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendant Pollard. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 2/21/12. (LAD)
|October 31, 2011
ORDER Plaintiff must file a Notice of Change of Address within 30 days. The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with th is Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 10/31/2011. (KMG)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?