Jones v. ReconTrust Company NA et al
| James L Jones, Jr. |
| ReconTrust Company NA and Bank of America Mortgage Corporate Office/ Headquarters |
| 3:2012cv08079 |
| April 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Mohave |
| Frederick J Martone |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED GRANTING the Bank's motion to strike sur-reply (doc. 74 ), DENYING plaintiff's motion to compel agency (doc. 63 ), and DENYING plaintiff's motion to compel production of documents (doc. 51 ). IT IS FURTHER ORD ERED GRANTING the Bank's motion for summary judgment (doc. 60 ), and DENYING plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (doc. 69 ). The clerk shall enter final judgment. (See document for full details). Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 6/19/13. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER DENYING plaintiff's 28 motion to disqualify. GRANTING in part and DENYING in part defendant's 27 motion to dismiss amended complaint. Defendant ReconTrust is dismissed from this action. Plaintiff's claim for quiet title re mains against Bank of America, N. A. DENYING plaintiff's 30 motion for sanctions, plaintiff's 31 motion for Rule 60 relief from judgment, and defendant's 35 motion to strike. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 9/20/12.(DMT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
