DRK Photo v. McGraw-Hill Companies Incorporated et al
| DRK Photo |
| McGraw-Hill Companies Incorporated and Unknown Parties |
| 3:2012cv08093 |
| May 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Yavapai |
| Paul G Rosenblatt |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to McGraw-Hill Companies Incorporated. (HLA)*** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Submitted by DRK Photo. (Submitted by Christopher Seidman). (HLA) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by DRK Photo. (Submitted by Christopher Seidman). (HLA) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-6771145. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Paul G Rosenblatt. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-12-8093-PCT-PGR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (HLA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 350.00, receipt number 0970-6771145, filed by DRK Photo. (Submitted by Christopher Seidman). (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits Index, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Civil Cover Sheet)(HLA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
