Parks v. Mohave, County of et al
| Edward F Parks |
| Charles L Ryan, Mohave, County of and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 3:2012cv08155 |
| August 1, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Yuma |
| David K Duncan (PS) |
| G Murray Snow |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER Petitioner's Petition for Habeas Corpus 1 and this case are dismissed without prejudice. Petitioner's Motion to Proceed Without Appellate Counsel 5 , untitled Document 7 , "Motion to Proceed with 5.00 payment of Filing Fees&q uot; 8 , and "Motion to Present, 13-603-L Commutation of Sent[e]nce, also Rule 32; File May 4th" 10 are denied as moot. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 10/16/12.(TLJ)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER denying without prejudice 2 Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In For ma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to comply, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice. The Clerk of Court must mail Petitioner a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Habeas). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 8/23/12.(TLJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
