Levingston v. Earle et al
| Lynnell Levingston |
| Raymon L Piburn, Unknown Parties, Victoria L Earle, Law Office of Victoria L Earle LLC and Patricia V Piburn |
| 3:2012cv08165 |
| August 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Apache |
| James A Teilborg |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER denying Defendants' 42 Motion to Reopen Case. ORDERED denying Defendants' 44 Renewed Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/4/2014.(LFIG)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 23 in full with prejudice; denying Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify the Honorable Judge Teilborg 31 ; Defendants may move for attorneys' fees as prescribed in the Court's earlier Order. See (Doc. 30 at 8). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall terminate this case. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/26/2014.(ALS)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER - ORDERD that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 23 ) is granted in part; the motion remains pending, in part, subject to supplemental briefing. Defendants Motion for Attorney's Fees (Doc. 23 ) is denied without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to address only fair use as discussed in this Order within fourteen days of the date of this Order. Defendant may reply within seven days from when Plaintiff responds. If Plaintiff does not respond, the M otion to Dismiss will be deemed granted in full with prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment consistent with this Order. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Costs, Attorney's Fees, Expense, Out-of-pocket Costs, a nd to Convert to a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 24 ) is denied. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default (Doc. 27 ) is denied because Defendants responded to the Amended Complaint (Doc. 22 ) with a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 23 ).FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Compliance with Rule 16 (Doc. 29 ) is denied because a Rule 16 Conference has not been held. FINALLY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motions for Sanctions (Docs. 24 and 26 ) are denied because there are no grounds to impose sanctions. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 11/20/2013.(TLB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
