Grand Canyon Skywalk Development LLC v. 'Sa' Nyu Wa Incorporated
| Grand Canyon Skywalk Development LLC |
| 'Sa' Nyu Wa Incorporated |
| 3:2012cv08183 |
| September 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| David G Campbell |
| Arbitration |
| 9 U.S.C. ยง 9 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER Petitioner Grand Canyon Skywalk Development, LLC's application for confirmation of an arbitration award (Doc. 1) is granted. Respondent 'Sa' Nyu Wa, Inc.'s motion to vacate the arbitration award and dismiss this matter (Doc . 7 ) is denied. Respondent 'Sa' Nyu Wa, Inc. shall remit damages in the amount of $28,572,810.25 to Grand Canyon Skywalk Development, LLC, as set forth in the August 16, 2012 Arbitration Order. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 2/8/2013. (KMG)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER. Petitioner to submit copies of pleadings of both parties leading up to the order of the Hualapai Tribal Court entered on 8/3/12. Documents must be filed with the court no later than 12:00 noon on 1/22/2012. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/18/2013. (NVO)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER Defendant SNW's Motion for Transfer [doc. 63 filed in CV-12-8030-PCT-DGC] is granted. The Clerk shall transfer Case No. CV-12-8183-FJM to this Court. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 11/21/12. (TLJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
