Pinnacle Pines Community Association v. Lexington Insurance Company et al
Pinnacle Pines Community Association |
Lexington Insurance Company, Everest National Insurance Company, Allied World National Assurance Company, Chartis Specialty Insurance Company, Hanover Insurance Company and Unknown Parties |
3:2012cv08202 |
October 1, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Prescott Division Office |
Maricopa |
David G Campbell |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 145 ORDER granting 115 and 117 Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment; denying 119 and 120 Plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment; and denying as moot 124 Defendant's Motion to Strike. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/9/14.(LSP) |
Filing 107 ORDER granting 96 Motion to Strike. Mr. Oliva is precluded from testifying at trial, Mr. Deatheredge and Mr. Dinslage will not be permitted to state opinions under Federal Rule of Evidence Rule 702, and Mr. Feldman has been withdrawn as an expert witness in this case. The Court will not award fees or costs for the bringing of this motion. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/13/2013.(TCA) |
Filing 53 ORDER denying 33 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/12/2013.(NVO) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.