Schenk et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
| Paul Schenk and Gail Schenk |
| Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation |
| 3:2012cv08223 |
| November 8, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Navajo |
| Paul G Rosenblatt |
| Personal Injury: Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
ORDER that parties' joint Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice (Doc. 114 ) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is rejected. See order for details. Signed by Judge Neil V. Wake on 8/27/14. (NKS) Modified on 8/29/2014 to WO per order (SJF).
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER that Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation's Motion to Preclude Plaintiffs' Punitive Damages Claim (Doc. 53 ) is denied. See order for details. Signed by Judge Neil V. Wake on 8/14/14. (NKS)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER that Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation's First Motion to Strike Expert Report of Robert Marx, D.D.S. (Doc. 39 ) is granted. FURTHER ORDERED that Novartis' Motion to Exclude Dr. Robert Marx's Specific Causation Opinions (Doc. 60 ) is granted. FURTHER ORDERED that Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation's Second Motion to Strike Expert Report of Robert Marx, D.D.S (Doc. 75 ) is stricken. See order for complete details. Signed by Judge Neil V. Wake on 7/23/14. (NKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
