United States of America v. Christensen
||United States of America
||Gary S Christensen
||March 14, 2012
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Prescott Division Office
||Frederick J Martone
|Nature of Suit:
||Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
|Cause of Action:
||26 U.S.C. § 7402
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|December 18, 2012
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the government will file a reply no later than Thursday, December 20, 2012. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent shall file a sur-response addressing his present inability to comply no later than Thursday, December 20, 2012. Finally, IT IS ORDERED that the parties will appear for a hearing on purgation of the contempt order on Friday, December 21, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. Respondent should come prepared to either produce the requested documents or produce credible evidence establishing his present inability to comply. Counsel for the United States should come prepared to cross examine the respondent [see Order for details]. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 12/18/12. (MAW)
|July 31, 2012
ORDER GRANTING petitioner's petition to enforce Internal Revenue Service summons (doc. 1 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 10 days of the entry of this order the parties confer and schedule a mutually agreeable time and location for respondent to appear, testify, and produce documents required by the summons before Agent Klepper or any other proper employee of the IRS no later than 30 days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 7/30/2012.(KMG)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?