Manuelito v. USA

Manuelito v. USA

Petitioner:	Nathan Brooks Manuelito
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	3:2013cv08071
Filed:	April 1, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Prescott Division Office
County:	Navajo
Presiding Judge:	Mark E Aspey (PS)
Presiding Judge:	Paul G Rosenblatt
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Vacate Sentence - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 12, 2015	Filing 26 ORDER denying 20 movant's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing on all Grounds [and] Reasons Specified in Motion and § 2255 [and] Motion Ad Testificandum on all Grounds. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying without prejudice 25 movant's Motion to Compel. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED ADOPTING 22 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Movant's Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 1 ) is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A certificate of appealability shall not issue and that the movant is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis because the movant has neither made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that reasonable jurists would find the Courts assessment of themovant's constitutional claims debatable or wrong. The Clerk shall enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 5/11/15. (LSP)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 12, 2015

Filing 26 ORDER denying 20 movant's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing on all Grounds [and] Reasons Specified in Motion and § 2255 [and] Motion Ad Testificandum on all Grounds. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying without prejudice 25 movant's Motion to Compel. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED ADOPTING 22 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Movant's Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 1 ) is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A certificate of appealability shall not issue and that the movant is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis because the movant has neither made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that reasonable jurists would find the Courts assessment of themovant's constitutional claims debatable or wrong. The Clerk shall enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 5/11/15. (LSP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Manuelito v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By:	Dimitra Hotis Sampson
Represented By:	Keith Eric Vercauteren
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Nathan Brooks Manuelito
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?