Henry v. Ryan et al
| John Henry, Jr. |
| Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan |
| 3:2013cv08268 |
| November 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| James A Teilborg |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER accepting 10 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is denied and dismissed with prejudice. In the event Petitioner files an appeal, issuance of a certificate of appealability is denied be cause denial of the petition is based on a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find this Court's procedural ruling debatable. The Clerk shall enter judgment of dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 8/1/14. (LSP)
|
|
Filing
10
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) be denied and dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be DENIED because the dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 6/27/14. (LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
