Francisco v. Navajo Nation Police Department et al
| Gerald Francisco |
| Navajo Nation Police Department and Unknown Williams |
| 3:2014cv08059 |
| April 7, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| James F Metcalf (PS) |
| David G Campbell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER - The Clerk of Court must vacate the June 1, 2015 Judgment (Doc. 21 ) and must reopen this case. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 22 ) and this action are dismissed for failure to state a claim, and the Clerk must enter judgm ent accordingly. The Clerk must make an entry on the docket stating that the dismissal for failure to state a claim may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The docket shall reflect that the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 06/17/15. (ATD)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER granting 16 Plaintiff's Application/Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Complaint is dismissed with 30 days leave to amend. Clerk must enter dismissal with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) if Plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/13/15.(LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
