Scharf et al v. Trabucco et al
| Helen Scharf, Karen Bright and Randall Scharf |
| Arnaldo Trabucco, Institute of Urology LLC, PHC-Fort Mohave Incorporated and Unknown Parties |
| 3:2014cv08183 |
| September 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| H Russel Holland |
| Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 79 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion is granted as to plaintiffs' claims based on allegations that Dr. Trabucco negligently performed Mr. Scharf's surgery. These claims are dismissed with prejudice. The motion is otherwise denied. Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 1/11/17.(EJA)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER granting 66 Defendant PHC-Fort Mohave, Inc.'s(VVMC) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 6/2/16.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER Defendants' motion to strike 51 is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted as to Dr. Mellman's standard of care opinions. The motion is otherwise denied although Dr. Danoff's testimony will be excluded if he fails to produce a case list acceptable to defendants by April 22, 2016. Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 3/21/2016.(KMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
