Borrud #232719 v. Ryan et al
| Jan Eldar Borrud |
| Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 3:2015cv08043 |
| March 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Steven P Logan |
| James F Metcalf |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 41 ) is accepted and adopted by the Court; the Motion for Delayed Filing (Doc. 52 ) is granted; the Motion for Clarification (Doc. 50 ) is denied as moot; the Motion for Stay and Abeyance (Doc. 44 ) and the Motion for Judicial Notice (Doc. 54 ) are denied; the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1 ) is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice; a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied because the dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable, and because jurists of reason would not find the court's assessment of the constitutional claim debatable or wrong; and the Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 3/21/17. (KGM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
