Gonzalez v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Lucille Gonzalez
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Case Number: 3:2015cv08078
Filed: May 6, 2015
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Prescott Division Office
County: Apache
Presiding Judge: John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 29, 2016 31 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - reversing the September 18, 2013 decision of the Administrative Law Judge, (R. at 14-30), as upheld by the Appeals Council; remanding this case to the Social Security Administration for a calculation of benefits; the Clerk shall enter final judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 9/29/16. (DXD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzalez v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lucille Gonzalez
Represented By: Mary Kay Fowler(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Represented By: Martha Boden
Represented By: Michael A Johns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?