Farber v. Brown et al
Brad Lee Farber |
Leonard Brown, Robert J Higgins, Brad Carlyon and Blaine Rhoton |
3:2015cv08149 |
August 21, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Prescott Division Office |
Navajo |
Susan R Bolton |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 IT IS ORDERED dismissing Defendant Leonard Brown. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 12/28/15. (EJA) |
Filing 12 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Rule 4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P., that this action shall be dismissed without further notice after December 21, 2015, unless before then Plaintiff has served Defendant Leonard Brown with the summons and complaint and has filed with the Clerk of the Court proof thereof pursuant to Rule 4(l) or has shown good cause for the failure to timely serve. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 10/22/15. (MAW) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #6 Defendants' Brad Carlyon and Blaine Rhotons Motion to Dismiss and #7 Defendant Judge Michael J. Higgins' Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 10/22/15. (EJA) |
Filing 10 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED directing Plaintiff to file with the Clerk of the Court and serve on opposing counsel a responsive memorandum to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss #6 and #7 no later than October 20, 2015 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 9/21/15. (MAW) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER: that pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge Susan R Bolton. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-15-08149-PCT-SRB. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KMG) |
Filing 8 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KMG) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Robert J Higgins. (Gillilan-Gibson, Kelly) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Party Defendants Carlyon and Rhoton by Brad Carlyon, Blaine Rhoton. (Jellison, James) |
Filing 5 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Brad Lee Farber. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (KMG) |
Filing 4 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Brad Lee Farber: USMS Process Receipt and Return re: Summons and Complaint upon Higgins on 8/28/2015, Brown on 8/26/2015 and Rhoton on 8/26/2015. (ACL) |
Filing 3 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number PHX162041. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michelle H Burns. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-15-08149-PCT-MHB. Magistrate Election form attached. (Attachments: #1 magistrate consent form)(GAR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number PHX162041 filed by Brad Lee Farber.(GAR) (11 pages) |
Summons Issued as to All Defendants at the front counter. (GAR). *** IMPORTANT: This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.