Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Wells et al
| Prudential Insurance Company of America |
| Jerry Lee Wells, Constance S Brenton, Lei Ann Stickney and James Robert Wells |
| 3:2015cv08170 |
| September 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Yavapai |
| David G Campbell |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for default judgment, or in the alternative, for appointment of a guardian ad litem 26 , is granted in part and denied in part; Paul J Theut is appointed as guardian ad litem for Defendant Jerry Lee Wells in this matte r; reasonable fees and expenses incurred by the guardian ad litem in connection with this matter shall be paid out of the Death Benefits to be deposited with the Court; within 21 days of Prudential's receipt of this order, Prudential shall depos it with the Clerk the Death Benefits, totaling $106,250, together with applicable interest, if any; the Clerk shall deposit the Death Benefits into the Registry of this Court, in an interest-bearing account; the Rule 16 case management conference currently set for 2/19/16 at 4:00 p.m. is vacated and reset for 4/7/16, at 4:30 p.m. (see order for complete details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 2/19/16. (REW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
