Despain v. BNSF Railway Company

Despain v. BNSF Railway Company

Plaintiff:	Gary Despain
Defendant:	BNSF Railway Company
Case Number:	3:2015cv08294
Filed:	December 10, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Prescott Division Office
County:	Navajo
Presiding Judge:	Neil V Wake
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 30, 2018	Filing 114 ORDER re: 97 Plaintiff's Motions In Limine Nos. 1-8, and 98 Defendant's Motions In Limine Nos. 1-15. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motions In Limine Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7 97 are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff� 39;s Motions In Limine Nos. 3, 4, and 8 97 are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motions In Limine Nos. 1, 5 (as to Mr. Cunningham's opinion), 6, 10, 11, 13, and 14 (as to the financial condition of Mr. Buffet) 98 are GRANT ED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motions In Limine Nos. 2, 3, 5 (as to Mr. Cunningham's facts), and 15 98 are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motions In Limine Nos. 4, 7, 8, 9, 12, and 14 98 are DENIED at this time. (See attached Order for further information.) Signed by Senior Judge Neil V. Wake on 5/30/2018. (RMW)
May 13, 2016	Filing 19 ORDER that Defendant BNSF Railway's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9 ) is denied. See order for complete details. Signed by Judge Neil V. Wake on 5/13/16. (NKS)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 30, 2018

Filing 114 ORDER re: 97 Plaintiff's Motions In Limine Nos. 1-8, and 98 Defendant's Motions In Limine Nos. 1-15. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motions In Limine Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7 97 are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff� 39;s Motions In Limine Nos. 3, 4, and 8 97 are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motions In Limine Nos. 1, 5 (as to Mr. Cunningham's opinion), 6, 10, 11, 13, and 14 (as to the financial condition of Mr. Buffet) 98 are GRANT ED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motions In Limine Nos. 2, 3, 5 (as to Mr. Cunningham's facts), and 15 98 are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motions In Limine Nos. 4, 7, 8, 9, 12, and 14 98 are DENIED at this time. (See attached Order for further information.) Signed by Senior Judge Neil V. Wake on 5/30/2018. (RMW)

May 13, 2016

Filing 19 ORDER that Defendant BNSF Railway's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9 ) is denied. See order for complete details. Signed by Judge Neil V. Wake on 5/13/16. (NKS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Despain v. BNSF Railway Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary Despain
Represented By:	Kristoffer S Mayfield
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?