Deel v. USA

Deel v. USA

Petitioner:	Gentry Dee Deel
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	3:2016cv08136
Filed:	June 25, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Prescott Division Office
County:	Navajo
Presiding Judge:	James F Metcalf (PS)
Presiding Judge:	G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 14, 2020	Filing 59 ORDER - Respondent United States of America's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 46 ) are OVERRULED. ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge James Metcalf (Doc. 43 ) is ADOPTED. ORDERED that Petitioner&# 039;s Revised Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 8 ) is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to terminate this action and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 10/8/20. (EJA)
February 12, 2019	Filing 53 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 43 Report and Recommendation. Deel's Motion to Vacate or Set Aside under § 2255 (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the Clerk shall terminate this action and enter judgment accordingly. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, in the event Movant files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 2/12/19. (DXD)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 14, 2020

Filing 59 ORDER - Respondent United States of America's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 46 ) are OVERRULED. ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge James Metcalf (Doc. 43 ) is ADOPTED. ORDERED that Petitioner&# 039;s Revised Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 8 ) is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to terminate this action and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 10/8/20. (EJA)

February 12, 2019

Filing 53 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 43 Report and Recommendation. Deel's Motion to Vacate or Set Aside under § 2255 (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the Clerk shall terminate this action and enter judgment accordingly. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, in the event Movant files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 2/12/19. (DXD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Deel v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By:	Roger W Dokken(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Gentry Dee Deel
Represented By:	Douglas F Behm
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?