Larsen v. United Parcel Service et al
| Kim Noreen Larsen |
| United Parcel Service and General Motors |
| 3:2016cv08191 |
| August 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Navajo |
| John J Tuchi |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER dismissing 7 Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint no later than 30 days from the date of this Order. Clerk shall enter dismissal if Plaintiff fails to comply. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiff's "Motion Regarding Rule 4(d) Waiving Service (Doc. 8 ) as moot. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 11/9/16.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER striking Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1 ) for failing to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 10(b); Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint that complies with Rules 8 and 10(b) no later than 30 days from the date of this O rder. If no Amended Complaint is timely filed, the Clerk shall dismiss this action without further Order of the Court; granting Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. 3 ); and denying Plaintiff's Motion for Service (Doc. 4 ). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 9/9/16. (KGM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
