Greenberg v. Ryan et al
| David Levy Greenberg |
| Charles L Ryan and Mark Brnovich |
| 3:2016cv08195 |
| August 31, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Coconino |
| Eileen S Willett (PS) |
| Steven P Logan |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION accepting 15 Report and Recommendation. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1 ) is denied and dismissed with prejudice. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied and the Clerk shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 1/22/18. (DXD)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. That Magistrate Judge Willett's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12 ) is accepted and adopted by the Court; 2. That the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Petitioner's Motion to Stay (Doc. 9 ) an d the motion is denied; 3. That Petitioner shall have until May 8, 2017 to file a Reply in accordance with Judge Willet's November 17, 2016 Order (Doc. 8 ); and 4. That this matter shall remain referred to Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 4/10/17.(SLQ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
