Prairie Farms LLC et al v. Colorado City, Town of et al
| Prairie Farms LLC, Claude Seth Cooke, Patrick Pipkin and Andrew Chatwin |
| Colorado City, Town of, Hildale, City of, Hildale/Colorado City Marshal's Office, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Fundamentalist Church of Latter Day Saints, Kenneth Brendel, Jerry Darger, Curtis Cooke and D Barlow |
| 3:2016cv08232 |
| October 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Mohave |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ORDER - Plaintiffs Andrew Chatwin and Patrick Pipkin, pursuant to Rule 68(a), have accepted the offers of judgment from Defendants Town of Colorado City, City of Hildale, Kenneth Brendel, Jerry Darger, Curtis Cooke, and D. Barlow. (Docs. 84 , [88 ].) IT IS ORDERED The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff Andrew Chatwin and against Defendants Town of Colorado City, City of Hildale, Kenneth Brendel, Jerry Darger, Curtis Cooke, and D. Barlow in the amount of $100,500.00 plus $10,000.00 for accrued costs and attorney's fees. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff Patrick Pipkin and against Defendants Town of Colorado City, City of Hildale, Kenneth Brendel, Jerry Darger, Curtis Cooke, and D. Barlow in the amount of $100,500.00 plus $10,000.00 for accrued costs and attorney's fees. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 8/22/17. (SLQ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
