Rodrigues v. Ryan et al
| Anthony L Rodrigues |
| Charles L Ryan, R Scott Marquardt, Odie Washington, Tara R Diaz, Jerry Sterns, Frank Shaw, Pamela Rider, Hector Santiago, Shahna Fredrick and James Winkler |
| 3:2016cv08272 |
| November 17, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Eileen S Willett (PS) |
| David G Campbell |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
146
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff show cause no later than January 11, 2019 why this case should not be dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to (i) abide by the Court's Order, and (ii) prosecute the case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 12/21/18. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff's "Notice and Motion to Compel Answer to First Amended Complaint" (Doc. 101 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiff's "Motion to Stay Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Request for Court Order" (Doc. 104 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Docs. 89 , 120 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED referring to the District Judge Plaintiff's renewed request for a temporary restraining o rder that is set forth in Plaintiff's "Notice and Motion to Compel Production and Renewed Request for Order of Protection" (Doc. 89 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Defendants' "Motion to Quash Plaintiff's Subpoenas " (Doc. 94 ). The subpoenas duces tecum purportedly served on non-parties CO III McNamer, ADOC Division Director Joe Profiri, ADOC Deputy Director Jeff Hood, ADOC Inspector General Greg Lauchner, and Governor Doug Ducey are quashed. IT IS FUR THER ORDERED granting Defendants' "Motion to Quash Plaintiff's Subpoenas" (Doc. 108 ). The subpoenas duces tecum purportedly served on non-parties Mohave County Attorney Matt Smith and ADOC "Grievance Appeals Administrator " are quashed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Plaintiff's "Motion for Extention [sic] of Time" (Doc. 124 ). Plaintiff's Response (Doc. 127 ) filed on February 22, 2018 is deemed timely. (See document for further details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 2/28/18. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER - The reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 24 ). Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 24 ) is granted in part and denied in part. The Motion is granted as to Plaintiff's Eight h Amendment official capacity claims against Ryan and Diaz and Plaintiff's negligence claim against Diaz in Count Three. The Motion is denied in all other respects. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/6/17. (SLQ)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER (Service Packet): The R&R 22 is accepted. Count One of the First Amended Complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Ryan, Rider, Santiago, Diaz, Winkler, and Frederick shall answer the Eighth Amendment threat-to-safety claim conta ined in Count Two of the First Amended Complaint. Defendants MTC, Washington, Rider, Santiago, Diaz, Winkler, and Frederick shall answer the Arizona common law claim for negligence in Count Three. Defendant MTC shall answer the negligent training c laim in Count Three. Counts Four, Five, and Six of the First Amended Complaint are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff a service packet including the First Amended Complaint, this Order, and a copy of the Marshals P rocess Receipt & Return form (USM-285) and Notice of Lawsuit & Request for Waiver of Service of Summons form for Defendants MTC, Washington and Frederick. Plaintiff shall complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. The United States Marshal will not provide service of process if Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/09/2017. (REK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
