Zotika v. Ryan et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 29, 2018
ORDER: Defendants' Expedited Motion to Quash Plaintiff's Subpoena to DPS 61 and Second Motion to Quash Subpoena to COIII McNamer 82 are denied as moot and without prejudice to refiling if appropriate. Plaintiff's Motion for Copy of Docket History 68 is denied. Plaintiff's Motions for Extension of Time to File Response (Docs. 70 , 73 ) are granted. Plaintiff's response 84 will be filed as timely. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production and Renewed Request f or Order of Protection 71 , is denied as moot and without prejudice to refiling if appropriate. Plaintiff's Motion and Request for Court to Order Defense Counsel to Effect Service on Defendant Shahana Fredrick 75 is granted. Defendants shall file a Notice with the Court no later than 14 days from the date of this order indicating whether service has been effected on Defendant Fredrick. Plaintiff's Renewed Appointment of Counsel 83 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension o f Time to File a Separate Statement of Facts in Opposition for Summary Judgment 86 and his Renewed Motion for Extension of Time 89 are granted. Plaintiff's Separate Statement of Facts shall be filed no later than April 16, 2018. Defendants shall have an additional 15 days from the date Plaintiff's controverting statement of facts is filed on the Court's docket to prepare a supplemental reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge David K Duncan on 3/29/2018. (REK)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?