Ellison v. Ryan et al
Charles David Ellison |
Charles L Ryan and James O'Neil |
3:2016cv08303 |
December 27, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Prescott Division Office |
Pinal |
Douglas L Rayes |
Death Penalty |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 77 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Ellison's Rule 59(e) motion (Doc. 74 ) is denied. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 5/7/24. (SLQ) |
Filing 71 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Ellison's amended habeas (Doc. 21 ) is denied. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and terminate this action. 2. Ellison's request for evidentiary development (Doc. 41 ) is denied. 3. A certi ficate of appealability is granted with respect to Claims 45(C)(1) and 45(C)(2). 4. The Clerk of Court shall forward a courtesy copy of this order to the Clerk of the Arizona Supreme Court, 1501 W. Washington, Phoenix, AZ 85007-3329. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 3/5/24. (SLQ) |
Filing 68 ORDER - Ellison's Motion for a Stay and Abeyance (Doc. 60 ) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ellison's request for federal habeas counsel to represent him in state court (Doc. 60 ) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Claim 27 is dismissed in part. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 7/28/23. (SMF) |
Filing 14 ORDER denying 10 Motion Preclude Juror Contact. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 04/25/2017.(KAS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.