Contreras et al v. Brown et al
Plaintiff: Arturo Contreras and Jose N Torres
Defendant: Chester David Brown, Unknown Parties and Legacy Incorporated
Case Number: 3:2017cv08217
Filed: October 24, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Prescott Division Office
County: Mohave
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 138 ORDER denying 122 Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' Expert Mary Rossi. [See attached order for complete details.] Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 5/10/2019. (RMW)
May 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 137 ORDER that Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 121 ) is GRANTED as to the direct negligence claims against Defendant Legacy. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 69 ) is GRANTE D IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion is granted as to the applicability of negligence per se, thus establishing the elements of duty and breach on Plaintiffs' first negligence claim, and as to the applicability of vicarious liability. The mo tion is denied as to the applicability of res ipsa loquitur, and Defendants' liability for negligence because there remains a genuine dispute as to causation. [See attached order for additional information.] Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 5/3/2019. (RMW)
January 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 115 ORDER denying 113 the fourth stipulation to extend deadlines. (See attached order for additional information.) Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 1/31/2019. (RMW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Contreras et al v. Brown et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arturo Contreras
Represented By: Justin Giordano Randall
Represented By: Dina H Romaya
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose N Torres
Represented By: Justin Giordano Randall
Represented By: Dina H Romaya
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chester David Brown
Represented By: Jeremy C Johnson
Represented By: Clarice A Spicker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Legacy Incorporated
Represented By: Jeremy C Johnson
Represented By: Clarice A Spicker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?