Contreras et al v. Brown et al
Arturo Contreras and Jose N Torres |
Chester David Brown, Unknown Parties and Legacy Incorporated |
3:2017cv08217 |
October 24, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Prescott Division Office |
Mohave |
James A Teilborg |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 138 ORDER denying 122 Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' Expert Mary Rossi. [See attached order for complete details.] Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 5/10/2019. (RMW) |
Filing 137 ORDER that Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 121 ) is GRANTED as to the direct negligence claims against Defendant Legacy. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 69 ) is GRANTE D IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion is granted as to the applicability of negligence per se, thus establishing the elements of duty and breach on Plaintiffs' first negligence claim, and as to the applicability of vicarious liability. The mo tion is denied as to the applicability of res ipsa loquitur, and Defendants' liability for negligence because there remains a genuine dispute as to causation. [See attached order for additional information.] Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 5/3/2019. (RMW) |
Filing 115 ORDER denying 113 the fourth stipulation to extend deadlines. (See attached order for additional information.) Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 1/31/2019. (RMW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.