Kirk v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Plaintiff: Esther Kirk
Defendant: Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Case Number: 3:2017cv08254
Filed: November 27, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Prescott Division Office
County: Coconino
Presiding Judge: Steven P Logan
Nature of Suit: Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 25 U.S.C. ยง 640
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER granting 12 ONHIR's Motion to Dismiss Count II. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 2/12/2019. (TCA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kirk v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Esther Kirk
Represented By: Susan Ingrid Eastman
Represented By: S Barry Paisner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?