Wheeler v. Ryan et al
||John Everett Wheeler
||Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
||April 10, 2018
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Prescott Division Office
||Deborah M Fine
||Neil V Wake
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 26, 2018
ORDER and DENIAL OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS: The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 62 is accepted. Petitioner's Motion for Clarification 40 , and Motion to Strike Respondents' Answer 60 are denied as moot. Petitioner's Motion to Expand the Record and Request Discovery 33 , Motion for Deposition and Discovery 34 , Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply and Supporting Documents 43 , Motion to Expand the Record 44 , Motio n to Amend/Correct Appendi[x] A 46 , Motion for Extension of Time to File Supplemental Memorandum of Points and Authority 54 , and Motion to Expand the Record and Compel Disclosure 57 are denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying and dismissing petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 22 with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this action. A request for a certificate of appealability is denied beca use appellant has not shown that "jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Signed by Senior Judge Neil V Wake on 9/26/2018. (REK)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?