Patsalis v. Ryan et al
| Atdom Mikels Patsalis |
| Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 3:2018cv08101 |
| May 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Pima |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| James A Teilborg |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER - The 32 Report and Recommendation is accepted, rejected, or modified as specified above. ORDERED that Respondent's objections (Doc. 35 ) are overruled or sustained as indicated above. ORDERED that the Petition is denied and dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. FINALLY ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is granted as to Petitioner's claim that his sentences were not proportional to his crimes under the Eighth Amendme nt (merged grounds five and seven of the Petition (see Doc. 32 at 17)) because Petitioner has stated a claim of constitutional magnitude and jurists of reason could find this Court's assessment of the claim debatable.15 A certificate of appealability is denied in all other respects as to all other claims because jurists of reason would not find this Court's rulings debatable as to Petitioner's other claims. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 8/18/20. (EJA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
