Brousseau v. Arizona, State of

Brousseau v. Arizona, State of

Plaintiff:	Joseph Brousseau
Defendant:	Arizona, State of
Case Number:	3:2018cv08106
Filed:	May 21, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Prescott Division Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 18, 2019	Filing 45 ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff shall supplement the mandatory initial disclosures to provide compliant responses under the MIDP by January 29, 2019. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall file an application for attorney's f ees and costs, as limited in this Order, by January 29, 2019. Because the Court has already determined Defendant's eligibility and entitlement to attorney's fees and costs, within the limits prescribed above, Defendant need only justify t o the Court the amount requested and its reasonableness under Local Rules 54.2(c)(3), (d) and (e). Plaintiff's counsel may file a responsive memorandum to Defendant's application, as provided in Local Rule 54.2(f), by February 12, 2019. The Court will enter an award of Defendant's attorney's fees and costs against Plaintiff's counsel upon review of the parties' submissions. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Defendant leave to file a motion to extend case management deadlines, as required, based on Plaintiff's tardy initial disclosures under the MIDP. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 1/18/19. (SLQ)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 18, 2019

Filing 45 ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff shall supplement the mandatory initial disclosures to provide compliant responses under the MIDP by January 29, 2019. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall file an application for attorney's f ees and costs, as limited in this Order, by January 29, 2019. Because the Court has already determined Defendant's eligibility and entitlement to attorney's fees and costs, within the limits prescribed above, Defendant need only justify t o the Court the amount requested and its reasonableness under Local Rules 54.2(c)(3), (d) and (e). Plaintiff's counsel may file a responsive memorandum to Defendant's application, as provided in Local Rule 54.2(f), by February 12, 2019. The Court will enter an award of Defendant's attorney's fees and costs against Plaintiff's counsel upon review of the parties' submissions. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Defendant leave to file a motion to extend case management deadlines, as required, based on Plaintiff's tardy initial disclosures under the MIDP. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 1/18/19. (SLQ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brousseau v. Arizona, State of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Brousseau
Represented By:	Jenny L Foley
Represented By:	Christopher Robert Houk
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona, State of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?