Northwest Arizona Employee Benefit Trust v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
| Northwest Arizona Employee Benefit Trust |
| Purdue Frederick Company Incorporated, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma LP, Mallinckrodt LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC, Allergan PLC, Purdue Pharma Incorporated, Actavis LLC, Unknown Parties, Cephalon Incorporated, Allergan Finance LLC, Endo Health Solutions Incorporated, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Incorporated, Endo Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Watson Laboratories Incorporated, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Actavis Pharma Incorporated, Cardinal Health Incorporated, Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited, Johnson and Johnson, Actavis Incorporated, Actavis PLC, Watson Pharma Incorporated and Watson Pharmaceuticals Incorporated |
| 3:2018cv08190 |
| August 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Mohave |
| John Z Boyle |
| Other Statutes: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Acknowledgement of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer in the Northern District of Ohio. New Case Number: 1:18-op-46043. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFIED MDL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-52) Transferring Case to the Northern District of Ohio Re MDL-2804. (MAP) |
| Remark: Case Transferred to the Northern District of Ohio via electronic transfer. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Northwest Arizona Employee Benefit Trust. (Attachments: #1 Summons Watson Laboratories, #2 Summons Watson Pharmaceuticals, #3 Summons Allergan PLC, #4 Summons Mallinckrodt LLC, #5 Summons Amerisource Drug, #6 Summons McKesson Corp, #7 Summons Cardinal Health, #8 Summons Mallinckrodt PLC, #9 Summons Actavis Pharma)(BAR). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAR) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-15852391. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John Z Boyle. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 18-08190-PCT-JZB. Magistrate Election form attached. (BAR) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Northwest Arizona Employee Benefit Trust. (Kilgard, Ron) (BAR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-15852391 filed by Northwest Arizona Employee Benefit Trust. (Kilgard, Ron) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
