Pistole v. Masher et al
| William George Pistole |
| Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Scott Masher |
| 3:2018cv08238 |
| September 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Bridget S Bade (PS) |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to the Court's Order filed October 25, 2018, judgment of dismissal is entered. Petitioner to take nothing and this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. (LAD) |
Filing 3
ORDER - (1) Petitioner's Petition for Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1 ), which the Court construes as filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241, and this case are dismissed without prejudice. (2) The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 10/24/18. (LAD)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (ATD) |
| Filing 1 *PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254). Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number PHX200961 filed by William George Pistole. (25 pages + Envelope) (ATD) *Modified to add additional attachment: #1 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; NEF regenerated on 9/26/2018 (ATD)/(SCH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
