Del Valle v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Gina Marie Del Valle
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2019cv08016
Filed: January 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Steven P Logan
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: See order for deadlines and details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 2/19/2019. (LMR)
February 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff shall be responsible for service by waiver or of the summons and complaint and shall file proof of service no later than 5/20/2019. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 2/13/19. (DXD)
February 8, 2019 Filing 8 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Gina Marie Del Valle. (DXD)
January 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Allow Electronic Filing (Doc. #3 ) is denied. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 1/23/19. (SLQ)
January 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall either pay the filing fee associated with this action or file a renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis that addresses the discrepancies identified in this order by March 6, 2019. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate this case without further order of the Court if Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the timeframe specified herein. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 1/22/19. (Attachments: #1 IFP)(SLQ)
January 22, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (SLQ)
January 18, 2019 Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-08016-PCT-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SLQ)
January 18, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by Gina Marie Del Valle. (SLQ)
January 18, 2019 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Gina Marie Del Valle. (SLQ)
January 18, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Gina Marie Del Valle. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(SLQ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Del Valle v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gina Marie Del Valle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?