John v. United States of America et al
| Ruth Ann John |
| United States of America and Jeehdeez'a Academy Incorporated |
| 3:2019cv08108 |
| April 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Susan M Brnovich |
| Personal Injury: Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Ruth Ann John: Affidavit of Process re: Complaint, Summons, etc. upon USA on 06/17/2019. (Anderson, Nathan) |
Filing 10
ORDER A Telephonic Scheduling Conference is set for 8/7/2019 at 08:45 AM in Courtroom 506, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Susan M Brnovich. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 6/21/2019. (TCA)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by United States of America.(Piensook, Kwan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE re: of Mailing (Service of Process) by Ruth Ann John to the United States of America. (Anderson, Nathan) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER:Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on July 10, 2019. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 4/11/2019. (TCA)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 4/11/2019. (TCA)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Jeehdeez'a Academy Incorporated, United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MCO) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16773015. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-8108-PCT-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Ruth Ann John. (Anderson, Nathan) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(MCO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16773015 filed by Ruth Ann John. (Anderson, Nathan) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
