Quinn v. Hacker-Agnew et al
| David Lee Quinn |
| Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Carla Hacker-Agnew |
| 3:2019cv08152 |
| May 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Camille D Bibles (PS) |
| David G Campbell |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by David Lee Quinn.(SLQ) (39 pages). |
Filing 4
ORDER - Petitioner's #2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. Petitioner's #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed without prejudice, with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file an amended petition. The Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice of this action, without further notice to Petitioner, if Petitioner fails to submit an amended petition on the court-approved form within 30 days from the filing date of this Order and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 7/2/19. (MSA)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SLQ) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by David Lee Quinn. (SLQ) (2 pages). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by David Lee Quinn. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(SLQ) (27 pages, plus envelope). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
