Save the Colorado et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
| Save the Colorado, Center for Biological Diversity and Living Rivers |
| David Bernhardt and United States Department of the Interior |
| 3:2019cv08285 |
| October 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michael T Liburdi |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to David Bernhardt, United States Department of the Interior. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Save the Colorado, Center for Biological Diversity, Living Rivers. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MCO) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MCO) |
| Filing 6 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17462671. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T Liburdi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-8285-PCT-MTL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Submitted by Center for Biological Diversity, Living Rivers, Save the Colorado. (Buchele, Thomas) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(MCO) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Center for Biological Diversity. (Buchele, Thomas) (MCO) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Living Rivers. (Buchele, Thomas) (MCO) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Save the Colorado. (Buchele, Thomas) (MCO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17462671 filed by Save the Colorado, Center for Biological Diversity, Living Rivers. (Buchele, Thomas) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCO) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Thomas C Buchele on behalf of Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity, Living Rivers, Save the Colorado. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for James N Saul on behalf of Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity, Living Rivers, Save the Colorado. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
