McDonald v. United States Postal Service et al
| Barney McDonald |
| Cynthia Cunha, Unknown Parties and United States Postal Service |
| 3:2019cv08303 |
| October 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Steven P Logan |
| Personal Injury: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Barney McDonald: Proof of Service re: Summons to USPS upon United States Postal Service on 10/28/2019. (Horton, Ricky) |
| Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Barney McDonald: Certificate of Service re: Summons to Cynthia Cunha upon Cynthia Cunha on 10/27/2019. (Horton, Ricky) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Cynthia Cunha, United States Postal Service. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(KEP). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 7 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #6 Order re Rule 12(b) Motions, Set Deadlines. (LMR) |
Filing 6
PRELIMINARY ORDER that a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) is discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motion to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. Unless the Court orders otherwise, on January 14, 2020, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/16/2019. (LMR)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Barney McDonald. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KEP) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17514090. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P. Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-8303-PCT-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KEP) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Barney McDonald. (Horton, Ricky) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(KEP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17514090 filed by Barney McDonald. (Horton, Ricky) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KEP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
