Stago et al v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
| Lula Stago, Mary Rose Charley and Frieda Thompson |
| Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation |
| 3:2020cv08118 |
| May 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Steven P Logan |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 25 U.S.C. ยง 640 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: See order for details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 5/26/2020. (LMR)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(DXD) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18307910. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Steven P Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-08118-PCT-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (DXD) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Mary Rose Charley, Lula Stago, Frieda Thompson (submitted by Lee Phillips). (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (DXD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-18307910 filed by Lula Stago, Frieda Thompson, Mary Rose Charley (submitted by Lee Phillips). (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (DXD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
