Christensen v. USA
Gary Steven Christensen |
USA |
3:2020cv08152 |
June 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Deborah M Fine (PS) |
David G Campbell |
Deborah M Fine |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence - Habeas Corpus |
28 U.S.C. § 1651 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis and #2 Motion to Stay Garnishment by Petitioner Gary Steven Christensen. (MSA) |
|
Filing 15 *NOTICE of Service by Mail of Government's Response to the Defendant's Motion to Extend Time to Respond to the Pending Garnishments (Doc. #14 ) by USA . (Price, Lori) *Modified text on 8/6/2020 (SLQ). |
Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re: #12 MOTION for Clarification of Court's Order re: #9 Service Order (2255) Response to Defendant's Request to Extend Time to Respond to Garnishments filed by USA. (Price, Lori) |
|
Filing 12 MOTION for Clarification of Court's Order re: #9 Service Order (2255) by Gary Steven Christensen. (3 pages) (KFZ) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Correct Address by Gary Steven Christensen. (LAD) (2 pages. Note: This is the same address currently on the docket, 5150 N Schultz Pass Road). |
Filing 10 REPLY to Government's Response to #7 Application for Entry of Default by Petitioner Gary Steven Christensen. (LAD) (3 pages) |
|
Filing 8 RESPONSE re: #7 Application for Entry of Default by Respondent USA. (Minder, Mary) |
Filing 7 APPLICATION for Entry of Default by Petitioner Gary Steven Christensen against USA. (LAD) (5 pages) |
Filing 6 REPLY to #5 Response to #2 MOTION to Stay filed by Gary Steven Christensen. (LAD) (3 pages) |
Filing 5 RESPONSE in Opposition re: #2 MOTION to Stay filed by USA. (Price, Lori) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. (BAS) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Stay All Restitution Payments and All Garnishment Proceedings by Gary Steven Christensen. (filed pro se 3 pages and 1 page order) (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(BAS) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Error Coram Nobis re: Criminal Case No CR14-8164-PCT-DGC filed by Gary Steven Christensen (submitted pro se 18 pages plus envelope). (Attachments: #1 envelope)(BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Christensen v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: USA | |
Represented By: | James Richard Knapp |
Represented By: | Lori Lynne Price |
Represented By: | Mary Bridget Minder |
Represented By: | Peter S Sexton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Gary Steven Christensen | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.