Wilson v. Clouse et al
Neko Wilson |
David Clouse and Navajo, County of |
3:2020cv08161 |
July 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Camille D Bibles (PS) |
Camille D Bibles |
John J Tuchi |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Neko Wilson: Proof of Service re: PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF upon Donna Herdstrom for Navajo County & Navajo County Sheriff on 7/13/20. (Phillips, Lee) |
Filing 6 Defts, David Clouse and Navajo County RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) by David Clouse, Navajo, County of.(Staton, Georgia) |
|
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to David Clouse, Navajo, County of. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
NOTICE of request for e-notices by Keith J. Hilzendeger. (Hilzendeger, Keith) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Neko Wilson. (submitted by Lee Phillips) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(REK) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254)/TRO Requested. Filing fee received: $5.00, receipt number 0970-18438441 filed by Neko Wilson. (submitted by Lee Phillips) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.