Young v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: June E Young
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2020cv08173
Filed: July 12, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Eileen S Willett
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2020 Filing 11 * SERVICE EXECUTED filed by June E Young: Notice of Service re: Summons upon William Barr, US Attorney General (August 24, 2020); Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (August 21, 2020); Michael Bailey, US Attorney for the District of Arizona (August 19, 2020) on August 24, 2020; August 21, 2020; August 19, 2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit (re Service))(Caldwell, Mark) * Modified to correct text on 8/28/2020 (LAD).
August 20, 2020 Filing 10 Magistrate Election Form Deadline. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(MAP)
August 20, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Marcelo Illarmo appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Illarmo, Marcelo)
August 10, 2020 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(LAD) (3 total)
August 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. #2 ). Within sixty (60) days after the answer is filed, Plaintiff must file an opening brief. Defendant must file an answering brief within thirty (30) days after service of Plaintiff's opening brief. Plaintiff may file a reply brief within fifteen (15) days after service of Defendant's answering brief. (See document for further details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 8/10/2020. (LAD)
July 13, 2020 Filing 6 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
July 12, 2020 Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Eileen S Willett. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-08173-PHX-ESW. Magistrate Election form attached. (BAC)
July 12, 2020 Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by June E Young. (Caldwell, Mark) (BAC)
July 12, 2020 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by June E Young. (Caldwell, Mark) (BAC)
July 12, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by June E Young. (Caldwell, Mark) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Young v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Marcelo N Illarmo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: June E Young
Represented By: Mark Ross Caldwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?