Zoldessy v. MUFG Union Bank NA
Adam Zoldessy |
MUFG Union Bank NA doing business as Union Bank |
3:2020cv08329 |
December 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Steven P Logan |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER: The parties' Stipulation #8 is granted. Defendant shall have until March 1, 2021, to file an answer to the Complaint and otherwise respond as provided by Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff shall have until March 29, 2021 to file a motion to remand. Signed by Judge Steven P. Logan on 1/13/2021. (LMR) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by MUFG Union Bank NA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Pomeroy, Timothy) |
Filing 7 ORDER: The parties' Stipulation #6 is granted. Defendant shall have until January 13, 2021, to file an answer to the Complaint and otherwise respond as provided by Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff shall have until February 11, 2021 to file a Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge Steven P. Logan on 12/21/2020. (LMR) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by MUFG Union Bank NA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Pomeroy, Timothy) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Chelsea Miller re: #4 Order by Defendant MUFG Union Bank NA. (Pomeroy, Timothy) |
Filing 4 PRELIMINARY ORDER (see attachment for details). Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 12/14/2020. (CLB) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (DXD) |
Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18960081. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Steven P Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-08329-PCT-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (DXD) |
Filing 1 *NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Coconino County Superior Court, case number S0300CV202000553. Filing fee received: $402.00, receipt number 0970-18960081 filed by MUFG Union Bank NA (submitted by Timothy Pomeroy). (Attachments: #1 State Court Docs, #2 State Court Docs, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Supplemental)(DXD) *Modified file date from 12/14/2020 to 12/10/2020; NEF regenerated on 12/15/2020 (SCH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Zoldessy v. MUFG Union Bank NA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MUFG Union Bank NA doing business as Union Bank | |
Represented By: | Timothy Robert Pomeroy |
Represented By: | Laurel Inman Handley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Adam Zoldessy | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.