Andrick v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Teresa Irene Andrick |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 3:2021cv08051 |
| March 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 *SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Teresa Irene Andrick: Proof of Service/Certified Mail Receipt re: Summons, Complaint upon Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security on 04/13/2021, United States Attorney's Office, District of Arizona on 4/15/2021 and Attorney General of USA, Department of Justice on 4/23/2021. (Attachments: #1 Summons Executed on Attorney General of USA, Department of Justice, #2 Summons Executed on Office of Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX, SSA)(Agrawal, Ashish) *Modified to clarify docket text on 5/5/2021 (MFR). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Carol Clark appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Clark, Carol) |
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties must fully comply with the deadlines and procedures set forth herein. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 3/17/2021. (RMV)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, United States Attorney's Office For the District of Arizona and Attorney General of USA (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(REM). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Ashish A Agrawal on behalf of Plaintiff Teresa Irene Andrick. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19246779. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L. Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-08051-PCT-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REM) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Teresa Irene Andrick. (Agrawal, Ashish) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(REM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19246779 filed by Teresa Irene Andrick.(Agrawal, Ashish) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Andrick v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Teresa Irene Andrick | |
| Represented By: | Ashish A Agrawal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Carol Clark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
