Morris v. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Incorporated
Plaintiff: Wallace Morris
Defendant: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Incorporated
Case Number: 3:2021cv08102
Filed: May 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Dominic W Lanza
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2021 Filing 18 NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Wallace Morris. (Thomas, Alden)
July 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand #7 is denied. See attached Order for details. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 7/2/2021. (KFZ)
July 1, 2021 Filing 16 NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Incorporated. (Woodard, Joshua)
July 1, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Wallace Morris. (Thomas, Alden)
June 28, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #13 Reply to Response to Motion filed by Wallace Morris. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MHW)
June 28, 2021 Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court for lack of subject matter filed by Wallace Morris. (Thomas, Alden)
June 22, 2021 Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion re: #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Woodard, Joshua)
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 2/25/2022. Dispositive motions due by 6/17/2022 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 6/17/21. (MAW)
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' joint Rule 26(f) report (Doc. #9 ), concludes it is unnecessary to hold a Rule 16 Case Management Conference. The Court will separately issue the Case Management Order. Counsel are to note at Item 12 of the Case Management Order that the deadlines are real, and the Court will enforce the deadlines set forth in the Order. The parties should plan their litigation activities accordingly. Ordered by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 6/17/21. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAW)
June 16, 2021 Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Incorporated. (Woodard, Joshua)
June 10, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. Please correct future pleadings. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DXD)
June 9, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Wallace Morris. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Thomas, Alden)
May 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 16(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court will issue a scheduling order after receiving the parties' Rule 26(f) report. After reviewing the Rule 26(f) report, the Court will set a case management conference if meeting with the parties appears necessary or helpful. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows: The parties are directed to meet, confer, and develop a Rule 26(f) Joint Case Management Report, which must be filed no later than June 16, 2021 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 5/19/21. (MAW)
May 17, 2021 Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal with Jury Demand by Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Incorporated.(Woodard, Joshua)
May 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRELIMINARY ORDER [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 5/11/21. (MAW)
May 10, 2021 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19450216. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-8102-PCT-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MYE)
May 10, 2021 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Incorporated. (Woodard, Joshua) (MYE)
May 10, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Yavapai County Superior Court, case number P1300CV202100302. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19450216 filed by Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Incorporated. (Woodard, Joshua) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit Verification)(MYE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morris v. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Incorporated
Represented By: Audrey Elaine Chastain
Represented By: Joshua Robert Woodard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wallace Morris
Represented By: Corrinne Rebecca Viola
Represented By: Alden A Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?