Parks v. Smith et al
Edward Faye Parks |
Mathew Smith, William Simon, Arizona, State of, David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Unknown Mormen |
3:2021cv08207 |
September 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Deborah M Fine (PS) |
Douglas L Rayes |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #8 ) is denied. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must pay the $5.00 filing fee. If Petitioner fails to pay the $5.00 filing fee, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 10/25/2021. (WLP) |
Filing 6 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's "Motion-Defendant's Request for Court Transfer, Due to Prejudice Against the Defendant" (Doc. #5 ) is denied. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 10/19/21. (SMH) |
Filing 8 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Edward Faye Parks. (SMH) (2 pages) |
Filing 7 *AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254). Terminating Respondents William Simon and State of Arizona filed by Edward Faye Parks. Related document: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254). (SMH) *Modified to correct terminated respondents on 10/19/2021. |
Filing 5 *MOTION to Change Venue/Transfer Case to another district by Edward Faye Parks. (SMH) (2 pages) *Modified to correct filed date from 10/8/21 to 10/7/21; NEF regenerated on 10/12/2021. (SMH)(CEI). |
Filing 4 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: (1) Petitioner's letter (Doc. #2 ) is denied without prejudice. (2) Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (3) If Petitioner fails to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner. (4) Petitioner's "Motion, Requesting a Hearing" (Doc. #1 ), which the Court construes as a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, is dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date of filing of this Order to file an amended 2254 petition in compliance with this Order. (5) If Petitioner fails to file an amended petition within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. (6) The Clerk of Court must mail Petitioner the current court-approved form for filing a "Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Non-Death Penalty)" and the current court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Habeas). See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 9/27/21. (SMH) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Edward Faye Parks. (1 Page) (REK) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Edward Faye Parks. (5 Pages and Envelope) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.