Sommer v. Kroger Company
| Rosemary Sommer |
| Kroger Company a foreign corporation doing business as Smith's Food and Drug and Unknown Parties |
| 3:2022cv08079 |
| May 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Susan M Brnovich |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Discovery due by 12/16/2022. Dispositive motions due by 4/28/2023. IT IS ORDERED the 6/23/2022 Rule 16 Case Management Conference is vacated. On 5/12/2023 at 8:45 a.m. (15 minutes allowed), the court will conduct a telephonic trial setting conference. Participants shall have their calendars available for the conference. The parties will receive dial-in instructions for connecting to the teleconference via electronic mail prior to the hearing. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 6/15/2022. (ESG)
|
| Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Rosemary Sommer. (Flores, Krystal) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE re: Service of Court Order by Rosemary Sommer re: #7 Order re Rule 12(b) Motions, . (Flores, Krystal) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Telephonic Case Management Conference is set for June 23, 2022 at 1:00 p.m. (15 minutes allowed). The parties will receive dial-in instructions for connecting to the teleconference via electronic mail prior to the hearing. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 5/11/2022. (ESG)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 5/11/2022. (ESG)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER Any motions, responses or replies filed for which a courtesy copy is not delivered to the Court, as required, will be stricken and not considered. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 5/11/2022. (ESG)
|
| Filing 5 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-20622280. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-8079-PCT-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (JAM) |
| Filing 4 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Kroger Company. (Zelms, Robert) (JAM) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal with Jury Demand by Kroger Company. (Zelms, Robert) (JAM) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Kroger Company. (Zelms, Robert) (JAM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Mohave County Superior Court, case number S8015CV202200271. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-20622280 filed by Kroger Company. (Zelms, Robert) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(JAM) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED: Notice of Service of Process re: Summons and Complaint upon The Kroger Company dba Smith's Food and Drug on 4/4/22. (Original filed in Mohave County Superior Court on 4/13/22.) (JAM) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
