Uddin v. Best Time Logistics Incorporated et al
| Zaheer Uddin |
| Best Time Logistics Incorporated, Singh Vikramjit, Unknown Vikramjit and Unknown Parties |
| 3:2022cv08189 |
| October 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michael T Liburdi |
| Personal Injury: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal- Property Damage (P.I.) |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Zaheer Uddin. (Riley, Rory) |
Filing 8
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED granting the parties' Stipulation to Continue Scheduling Conference Set for December 5, 2022 (Doc. #6 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference shall be set for December 15, 2022 at 1:00 pm (Arizona time) in Courtroom 504, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Michael T. Liburdi. Ordered by Judge Michael T. Liburdi on 10/25/2022. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (LMR)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Zaheer Uddin. (Riley, Rory) |
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference by Best Time Logistics Incorporated, Singh Vikramjit. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Spicker, Clarice) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Best Time Logistics Incorporated, Singh Vikramjit. (Spicker, Clarice) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 12/5/2022 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 504, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Michael T. Liburdi. See order for additional deadlines and details. Signed by Judge Michael T. Liburdi on 10/14/2022. (LMR)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Best Time Logistics Incorporated. (ARC) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21190410. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T Liburdi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-8189-PCT-MTL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Navajo County Superior Court, case number S0900CV202200205. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21190410 filed by Singh Vikramjit. (Spicker, Clarice) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C)(ARC) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 9/6/2022 to Singh Vikramjit. (Original filed in Navajo County Superior Court on 9/13/2022); Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Civil Case Cover Sheet, Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon Best Time Logistics Incorporated on 6/7/2022. (Original filed in Navajo County Superior Court on 6/21/2022). (ARC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED: ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Best Time Logistics Incorporated. ENTERED IN DISTRICT COURT FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PURPOSES***(ARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
