McDonald v. Unknown Party
Petitioner: Tim McDonald
Respondent: Unknown Party, David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Case Number: 3:2022cv08209
Filed: November 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Michelle H Burns (PS)
Referring Judge: Steven P Logan
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2022 Filing 7 *AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254), terminating Unknown Party, filed by Tim McDonald.(CLM) (72 pages) *Modified to correct file date on 12/29/2022 (REK).
December 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. #4 ) is denied. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 12/5/2022. (CLM)
December 2, 2022 Filing 5 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 200003415. PAID IN FULL. (BAS)
December 1, 2022 Filing 4 *MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Tim McDonald. (CLM) (2 pages) *Modified to correct file date from 12/2/2022 to 12/1/2022; NEF regenerated on 12/5/2022 (CLM)/(SCH).
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Petitioners "Arizona Corruption and Prosecutorial Misconduct" (Doc. #1 ), which the Court construes as a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, is dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date of filing of this Order to file an amended 2254 petition in compliance with this Order. Failure to comply will result in the Clerk entering a judgment of dismissal in this action without prejudice and without further notice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 11/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP, #2 2254 Petition)(CLM)
November 17, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (CLM)
November 17, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Tim McDonald. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CLM) (9 pages)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McDonald v. Unknown Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tim McDonald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Unknown Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Shinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?