Tudela et al v. Simaran Express Incorporated et al
Lilliana Tudela, Marisol Lopez, Mirian Evans, Marlene Franco and Marleen Falcon |
Simaran Express Incorporated, Jaramanjeet Sigh and Unknow Parties |
3:2022cv08220 |
December 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Stephen M McNamee |
John J Tuchi |
Personal Injury: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER granting Motion to Consolidate Cases (26 in case 3:22-cv-08099-JJT). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 1/13/2023. The Clerk shall transfer civil action CV-22-08220-PCT-SMM to Judge John J. Tuchi for all further proceedings. The Clerk shall consolidate Case No. CV-22-08220-PCT-SMM and CV-22-08099-PCT-JJT with CV-22-08099-PCT-JJT as the lead case. All future pleadings and papers submitted for filing shall bear the following complete case number: CV-22-08099-PCT-JJT and shall be filed only in the lead case. (Associated Cases: 3:22-cv-08099-JJT, 3:22-cv-08220-SMM) (CLM) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Simaran Express Incorporated, Jarmanjeet Singh. *Redocketed by Clerk using correct event for statistical purposes* (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Associated Cases: CV-22-08099-PHX-JJT, CV-22-08220-PHX-SMM) (DXD) |
Filing 7 **Redocketed at #8 Motion** STIPULATION to Consolidate Cases by Jaramanjeet Sigh, Simaran Express Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Byrne, Robert) Modified on 1/12/2023 (DXD). |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Nicholas A Norden on behalf of Plaintiffs Mirian Evans, Marleen Falcon, Marlene Franco, Marisol Lopez, Lilliana Tudela. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 6 ORDER setting a Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference for 2/8/2023 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 401, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 12/16/2022. (See Order for details.) (LFIG) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal, with Jury Demand by Jaramanjeet Sigh, Simaran Express Incorporated.(Byrne, Robert) |
Filing 4 *NOTICE of Errata re: #1 Notice of Removal by Defendants Jaramanjeet Sigh, Simaran Express Incorporated.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Exhibit 2)(Byrne, Robert) *Modified to add document link on 12/9/2022 (REK). |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21384801. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Stephen M McNamee. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-8220-PCT-SMM. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Simaran Express Incorporated. (Byrne, Robert) (ARC) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Mohave County Superior Court, case number S8015CV202201274. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21384801 filed by Simaran Express Incorporated, Jaramanjeet Sigh. (Byrne, Robert) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(ARC) |
***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Acceptance of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Discovery upon Simaran Express Incorporated, Jaramanjeet Sigh on 11/9/2022. (Original filed in Mohave County Superior Court on 12/2/2022) (ARC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.