Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Corporation v. Orion Structure LLC et al
| Dassault Systemes Solidworks Corporation |
| Orion Structure LLC and Roark Wolfe |
| 3:2022cv08240 |
| December 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Stephen M McNamee |
| Property Rights: Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to terminate this action in its entirety. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 1/20/2023. (LFIG)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Dassault Systemes Solidworks Corporation. (Valentine, Alexander) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing - Copyright, Trademark or Patent Information filed by Dassault Systemes Solidworks Corporation. (Valentine, Alexander) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Dassault Systemes Solidworks Corporation. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REM) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Orion Structure LLC, Roark Wolfe. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(REM). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER: Request for Copyright, Trademark, or Patent Information. This case has been designated as a copyright, trademark, or patent case. The Clerk's Office is required to provide information to the Patent and Trademark Office and/or Copyright Office regarding this case. Attached to this docket entry are the required form(s) that must be completed. Plaintiff shall complete the form that is applicable to this particular case. In some cases, you may need to complete both forms.Within seven (7) days, Plaintiff must submit the required form(s) to the Clerk's Office. Please complete the form and file it with the Court using the specific event: Notice of Filing - Copyright, Trademark or Patent Information, found under the Other Filings header. Please DO NOT mail the form directly to the Patent or Copyright Office. The Clerk's Office will submit the form. If neither form is required for this case, please file a notice indicating the reason the form is not necessary and use the event listed above. This form must be updated if additional patents, copyrights, or trademarks are alleged in a responsive pleading. (Attachments: #1 AO 121)(REM) |
| Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21435393. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Stephen M McNamee. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-08240-PCT-SMM. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REM) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Dassault Systemes Solidworks Corporation. (Valentine, Alexander) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(REM) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Dassault Systemes Solidworks Corporation. (REM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21435393 filed by Dassault Systemes Solidworks Corporation. (Valentine, Alexander) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6)(REM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
